“[YouTube is] democratized entertainment, where people watch what they want to watch instead of what the TV thrusts upon us.” –Matt Harding, YouTube traveling/dancing sensation (Bonk, Pg.215)
I can remember in High school and College having teachers and professors limit the amount of internet resources we were able to use on a given project. It seems, for now, that those days are over as Internet resources continue to grow, evolve and become more reliable. In Chapter 7 of “The World is Open”, author Curtis Bonk tends to agree…
Bonk argues that E-learning has shifted from a radical idea (with unproven effectiveness) to a widely regarded mainstream phenomena (204). In addition to becoming more popular, Internet research has shifted primarily as a text-based endeavor to becoming overwhelmingly video/multi-media driven thanks to sites like YouTube, Teacher Tube, School Tube, ETC. with over 65 million viewers a day and 10 new videos being uploaded per second, YouTube is by far the biggest of these video sites and Bonk points out that it is 4th in internet traffic only behind Yahoo!, Google, and MSN. I wonder if Teacher Tube, School Tube, ISIS, and Current TV are going to have to take a page out of the satellite radio book (we all knew 2 satellite companies were not needed and that XM and Sirius were going to have to merge to survive, and inevitably did) and band together to offer a safer, education friendly alternative to YouTube ???
(side note: finally seeing Bonk agree with the doubt I’ve had all along with this book; all of this technology is great if students actually choose to learn with it, however that takes an ENOURMOUS amount of discipline and physical restraint. Bonk finally admits YouTube is generally used for entertainment!)
Internet and video learning has churned out pseudo-celebrities like Matt Harding (above) who quit his monotonous programming job in favor of traveling the world and video blogging (Vlogging) his adventures. Likewise, “Did you Know” creator Karl Fisch,a high school teacher in Colorado, who's presentation was merely created for a room of no more than 150 colleagues, has rapidly ascended to fame and has had his presentation viewed by millions. In essence, anyone with internet access has the opportunity to churn out work that can be viewed and appreciated by the masses. In fact, Harvard graduate Trip Alder, discussed later in the chapter, founded the website Scribd for that very reason; he was sick and tired of pouring his heart out in every paper, only to have it read and hurriedly corrected by one person (243). Harding, Fisch, and Adler are just 3 of many discussed by Bonk in Chapter 7 that have used web 2.0 technology to carve their own path in the democratized digital learning world and have all since been sponsored by corporations like Stride gum and have made appearances on TV shows and in Educational works.
How’s that for hitting “upload” to your bright idea?
Another part of the chapter that I also found interesting was the discussion on Wikis. I now know that Wiki is Hawaiian for “fast” and that others took the acronym from the phrase “What I know is…” While I do understand Wikimedia’s attempts at making Wikipedia more stable in moderating it’s changes and providing unchangeable pages, I do fully agree with Middlebury College’s suggestion (pg 239) that it is better for general, fast, useful knowledge rather than for citing sources and generating valid research.
I may adopt Middlebury’s policy in my future classroom that Wikipedia may not be cited as a source on research projects. Otherwise, students will limit themselves to trusting the first 3 pages that pop up on Google search (which usually involves Wikipedia) which may have questionable validity, but is also downright lazy. I’d like to see some deeper digging such as research done on sites suggested by Bonk in this chapter. I know I have had classes at SNHU in the past that only allowed students to utilize Shapiro Library database links for this very reason. It’s time to take research to the next level, make a contribution, and also to experiment with the vastly growing (sometimes overwhelming) web 2.0 tools available. However, all must be done in a reasonable manner.

